Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

 
Content: content is that part of a statement, what can be represented by another statement, which differs in a respect from the original statement, e.g. it uses other expressions with the same reference. That, in which the second statement deviates belongs then to the vocabulary, to the syntax or grammar, the matching can be called content.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 66f
Wide Content: causal relations to the world beyond the words so meanings are not in the head (Putnam pro, but not "wide content" (>Fodor).
---
II 26f
Fulfillment of conditions: are fixed by propositional content - there is not a desire or belief without fulfillment conditions. (i.e. no regress).
- - -
II 80
Deception: E.g. the moon is bigger on the horizon: that is part of the content. - Solution: if we had no beliefs, we would believe the moon had changed its size.
---
II 87
Content/Searle: is not the same as object.
---
II 196
Hallucination/Deception: brains in the vat have exactly the same intentional content.
---
II 319
Intentional Content/Pierre Example/Searle: intentional content is sufficient, and that is different in "London is ugly" and "Londres est jolie" -Kripke: intentional content is not rigid, because descriptions are not rigid either - Names: neither equivalent to descriptions nor to intentional contents.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

S I
J. R. Searle
Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes Frankfurt 1996

S II
J.R. Searle
Intentionalität Frankfurt 1991

S III
J. R. Searle
Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit Hamburg 1997

S IV
J.R. Searle
Ausdruck und Bedeutung Frankfurt 1982

S V
J. R. Searle
Sprechakte Frankfurt 1983


> Counter arguments against Searle

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-22