Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Inferences: when we move from premises to conclusions we carry out inferences.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Summary Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 255
Inferential Structure/Brandom: Three Dimensions: 1) Determination and authorization to FL.
---
I 256
2) Differentiation of accompanying and communicative inheritance deontic status.
---
I 257
3) Inferential structure: in a broader sense: authority, responsibility, authorizationty.
---
I 284
Brandom: Keyword: Concluding - combines semantic content and pragmatic significance.
---
I 496
Inference/Brandom: premises and conclusions: are complete sentences ("free-standing") - Opposite: Conditional: antecedent and consequent: are subsentential expressions ("embedded").
---
I 650
Inference/Brandom: semantic significance of types - anaphora: semantic significance of Tokenings - Inference: reporting use sentences - anaphora: deictic use singular terms - conceptual structure is primarily inferential structure - the use of a demonstrative refers to an object and thus becomes a singular term - (other than "ouch") and can also play an anaphoric role.
---
II 9
Inference/Brandom: Priority of reference.
---
II 35
Non-inferential/Brandom: E.g. perception of circumstances.
---
II 70
Inference/Brandom: even non-inferential reports (perception reports) must be structured inferentially (Sellars and Hegel) - otherwise not distinguishable from RDRDs (reliable differential responsive dispositions) (machines) - Parrot: does not understand his own reactions - non-inferential concept: E.g. red - but: just like one acquires concepts through the mastery of other concepts, one needs inferential concepts to arrive at non-inferential ones.
---
Newen/Schrenk I 164
Inferential Roles/Brandom/Newen/Schrenk: a) voice exit rule: actions are considered to be adequate practical conclusions E.g. -"The pot is boiling over-" > urges the action of taking it from the stove - b) entry rule: involves perceptions of both the environment and of one's own body conditions. This leads to perception reports.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Brandom

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-10-22