## Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments | |||

Author | Item | Excerpt | Meta data |
---|---|---|---|

Books on Amazon |
II 255 Material conditional/paradoxes of the material implication/Jackson/Field: best solution: (Jackson, 1979): Thesis: Contraintuitive conclusions are unacceptable here: the conclusions cannot be asserted, but nevertheless true - there is a conventional implication for that if we assert "if A then B", not only the probability is high (A > B) , but also the conditional probability P (A > B I A). - N.B./Field: the demand that P (A > B I A) should be high is equivalent to the demand of the nonfactualist that P (B I A) is high. - "surface logic": has to do with assertibility- "depth logic": says what is truth-maintaining. --- II 256 Factualism: has then to distinguish between levels of total unacceptability (i.e., on the surface) and acceptability at a deep level. Deflationism: in the same way the deflationism can distinguish between nonfactualism and factualism without using the terms "true" or "fact". Factualism: the factualism does not accept any contraintive conclusions - nonfactualism: seems committed to it. |
Fie I H. Field Realism, Mathematics and Modality Oxford New York 1989 Fie II H. Field Truth and the Absence of Fact Oxford New York 2001 Fie III H. Field Science without numbers Princeton New Jersey 1980 |

> Counter arguments against **Field**

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei

Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-28