Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
General validity: within a calculus a formula that is satisfied by any interpretation (variable assignment with expressions for objects) is valid. See also satisfaction, satisfiability, interpretation.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
V 201
Validity/Urmson: "valid" is a value expression 1. Therefore, it cannot be re-defined descriptively - 2. from the description of a deductive conclusion cannot be shown that it is valid - fallacy of criticism of naturalistic fallacy of assertiveness/SearleVsUrmson: wrong to assume that it is logically impossible to derive a value statement of descriptive expressions - solution: therefore, by saying that a conclusion is deductive, the criteria for its validity have already been established (that the conclusion follows from the premises - this is a special case: here no logical gap between importance of a value expression and application criteria.

S I
J. R. Searle
Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes Frankfurt 1996

S II
J.R. Searle
Intentionalität Frankfurt 1991

S III
J. R. Searle
Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit Hamburg 1997

S IV
J.R. Searle
Ausdruck und Bedeutung Frankfurt 1982

S V
J. R. Searle
Sprechakte Frankfurt 1983


> Counter arguments against Searle



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-25