|General validity: within a calculus a formula that is satisfied by any interpretation (variable assignment with expressions for objects) is valid. See also satisfaction, satisfiability, interpretation._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
Validity/Methods/Meaning/application/Sense/Theory/Metatheory/Habermas: methodological questions are about questions of understanding the sense.
Theoretical questions are about actions.
Questions of meaning are all about the sense that was understood.
Questions of validity are about implied correctness.
Validity/Habermas: to arrive at a theory of understanding oriented action, we must generalize the concept of validity, beyond the truth validity of propositions. Validity conditions can then no longer only be identified at the semantic level for sentences, but at the pragmatic level for expressions. To do this, there must be a break with the "logos-labelling of the language" (1), i.e. with the privileged representation function. This also has consequences for the ontological prerequisites of language theory.
1.K.O. Apel, Zwei paradigmatische Antworten auf die Frage nach der Logosauszeichnung der Sprache, in: Festschrift für Perpeet, Bonn, 1980._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne Frankfurt 1988
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. I Frankfurt/M. 1981
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. II Frankfurt/M. 1981