Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
III 22
functional laws / Armstrong: Q = f (P): it may well be that P has no value at any time - for simplicity: better not to accept this as a "missing" value, but as a value.
III 111
functional laws / Armstrong: Problem: missing values (relationship to uninstantiated laws) - form: (x) ((P) (Px> (EQ) (Qx & Q = f (P)) - many authors: laws involve rather physical values than properties - ArmstrongVs: a function such as "rest mass in kg" will map an object to 5.3, due to a property of the object, i.e. in this case the mass that it has, and not vice versa.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983

> Counter arguments against Armstrong

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-22