Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Author Item Summary Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
III 22
functional laws / Armstrong: Q = f (P): it may well be that P has no value at any time - for simplicity: better not to accept this as a "missing" value, but as a value.
III 111
functional laws / Armstrong: Problem: missing values (relationship to uninstantiated laws) - form: (x) ((P) (Px> (EQ) (Qx & Q = f (P)) - many authors: laws involve rather physical values than properties - ArmstrongVs: a function such as "rest mass in kg" will map an object to 5.3, due to a property of the object, i.e. in this case the mass that it has, and not vice versa.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

In
Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

AR III
D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Armstrong

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-12-17