Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 123
Counterpart theory / Stalnaker: (different from Lewis): actualistic version - no equivalence relation, non-transitive - non-symmetrical! - - Def c.r. / Stalnaker: (here) c.r. holds between a and b iff representatives a and b represent the same individual - I 125 c.r. must be flexible - can not be transitive - a could have two counterparts in another world -

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Sta I
R. Stalnaker
Ways a World may be Oxford New York 2003

> Counter arguments against Stalnaker
> Counter arguments in relation to Counterpart Theory

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-26