Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Epistemology, philosophy: examines the conditions for the emergence of knowledge and the basis for justification and confirmation. Epistemology cannot explain special cases in which someone who has less information may give more correct answers. See also knowledge, theory, justification, confirmation, reliability.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
II 477
Knowledge/Popper: there is no clear, safe and absolute starting point for knowledge. Neither senses, nor reason, nor thinking, nor common sense.
---
II 486
Knowledge/Popper: equal to the content of problems, theories and arguments as such.

_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Po I
K. Popper
Objektive Erkenntnis Hamburg 1993


> Counter arguments against Popper
> Counter arguments in relation to Epistemology



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-24