Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

He, he himself, he*, philosophy: this is about the question of how far pronouns like "he" can be made clear so that any confusion in the use of language is impossible. E.g. "He believes he is fat" may refer to one or two people. See also indexicality, index words, individuation, identification, self-reference, ascription, self-ascription, privileged access, self-identification.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Frank I 180f
he * / himself / Castaneda: not representative of a description: "the editor knows that he* is a millionaire" - probably referring to himself, but not as editor - always different descriptions and self-identifications possible - "he*" is by no analysis eliminatable - instead we use an unanalyzed basic concept: "the unique way of referring to X as Z".
I 207
Token(sw) of ’he* "("himself", etc) can not be replaced for their user - e.g. "Alexander believed that he* knew he* was once convinced that he* was a god.".

Cast I
H.-N. Castaneda
Phenomeno-Logic of the I: Essays on Self-Consciousness Bloomington 1999

Fra I
M. Frank (Hrsg.)
Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewusstseins Frankfurt 1994

> Counter arguments against Castaneda

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-25