Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Simplicity philosophy: is not definable. E.g. One could try to define the simplicity of an object by the fact that the subject requires the shortest description. This is bound to fail, because the symbols used in the description in turn may refer to complex entities. See also unity, complexity, descriptions.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
AU Cass 8
Simplicity / Luhmann: Middle Ages assumed that only complex aggregates can fall apart - (E.g. the soul is simple) - nowadays: we do not have the concept of simplicity - complexity is a concept without a counter term - this is unusual - concept without a counter term: E.g. sense - even the negation must have a meaning - e.g. world

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

N. Luhmann
Einführung in die Systemtheorie Heidelberg 1992

Lu I
N. Luhmann
Die Kunst der Gesellschaft Frankfurt 1997

> Counter arguments against Luhmann
> Counter arguments in relation to Simplicity

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-25