|Quine, Two Dogmas of Empricism:|
1st Dogma distinction analytic/synthetic - 2nd Dogma reductionism. The belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to a logical construction of terms which refer to immediate experience. - Quine, W.V.O. (1951), "Two Dogmas of Empiricism," The Philosophical Review 60, 20–43. Reprinted in his 1953 From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press. See also analytic/synthetic, reduction, reductionism, conceptual schemes, holism. Later D. Davidson discussed a 3rd dogma (separation scheme/content)._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
|K. Glüer, Davidson zur Einführung, 1993
Glüer II 121 ff
Incommensuralibility/Davidson: sets separation scheme / content (3rd Dogma). Scheme / content / Davidson: (Third Dogma): Scheme: Language in Quine - Content: "empirical meaning" in Quine. (McDowell).
Glüer II 129
2nd Dogma / Quine / Davidson: reductionism: the claim that every meaningful statement is equivalent to a logical construction of terms which refer to immediate experience - ((s) instead network with purely logical truths in the center)._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
Der Mythos des Subjektiven Stuttgart 1993
Handlung und Ereignis Frankfurt 1990
Wahrheit und Interpretation Frankfurt 1990
D. Davidson Zur Einführung Hamburg 1993