Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Quine, Two Dogmas of Empricism:
1st Dogma distinction analytic/synthetic - 2nd Dogma reductionism. The belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to a logical construction of terms which refer to immediate experience. - Quine, W.V.O. (1951), "Two Dogmas of Empiricism," The Philosophical Review 60, 20–43. Reprinted in his 1953 From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press. See also analytic/synthetic, reduction, reductionism, conceptual schemes, holism. Later D. Davidson discussed a 3rd dogma (separation scheme/content).
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 203
Two Dogmas/Quine/Brandom: But the two options - fact or relation of imagination, expression of determination as belief or definition of meaning should not be considered an exhaustive alternative by the reader of "Two Dogmas".
I 813
Brandom: Both the internal and external inferential relations of a concept are pragmatically and methodologically on the same level. This is the core of the meaning holism of "Two Dogmas".
I 674
Content/Two Dogmas/Brandom: content does not need to change if the center and periphery change.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Brandom

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-27