Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon:
Richard Rorty
IV 115
Thing in itself / RortyVsKant: he needs the noumenal (thing in itself) only to introduce appearance - no appearance without appearing - as Aristotle requires a form of the formless - and e.g. Spinoza the distinct idea of ​​indistinct - similar: Wittgenstein s silence in the face of discrimination useful / useless - RortyVsWittgenstein: one has to know a lot before one can conclude that the metaphysician says something meaningless
VI 129
is / be / translucent / appear / appearance / Rorty: false distinction between things - "in itself" and "for us" - RortyVsKant.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Ro I
R. Rorty
Der Spiegel der Natur Frankfurt 1997

R. Rorty
Philosophie & die Zukunft Frankfurt 2000

R. Rorty
Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität Frankfurt 1992

R. Rorty
Eine Kultur ohne Zentrum Stuttgart 1993

Ro V
R. Rorty
Solidarität oder Objektivität? Stuttgart 1998

R. Rorty
Wahrheit und Fortschritt Frankfurt 2000

> Counter arguments against Rorty

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-22