Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Forms of arguments, typical patterns.:

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Summary Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
III 126
In fact, it seems that the two worlds are identical, except that there is a permutation of identities, that is, of counterparts. This, the anti-Haeccetist replies, is a distinction without distinction!
---
II 252
Now, here, all meaning of "truth" and "falsehood" is abstracted, except for their difference.
---
III 59
The classical view with the substitution of Bolzano produces too much: it counts conclusions as valid, which are obviously invalid.
But it also produces too little by citing arguments as invalid which should be recognized as valid in a plausible manner.
---
III 78
It is disputed whether the production of such a counterexample is a necessary condition for the invalidity. That is, whether the inability to produce one is sufficient for validity.
---
III 113
Stalnaker: includes an "impossible world" under his worlds, which he calls lambda, in which every statement is true! All such conditional sentences are found to be true here.
---
III 212
If the boundary (interpretation or naming) between two things is indeterminate, one is the other in an undefined way.
---
III 232
But if we were to protest against the introduction of a new link with the sole reason that it leads to a paradox, this objection would be entirely ad hoc. There would be no diagnosis of the problem.
---
III 232f
Bluriness (fuzzy): does not help with Sorites - graduation distribution is no possibility distribution.
---
I 54
Impermissible duplication: the mythical Crete, as different from Greek Crete, the historical, the European, the remembered.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
Logic Texts
Me I Albert Menne Folgerichtig Denken Darmstadt 1988
HH II Hoyningen-Huene Formale Logik, Stuttgart 1998
Re III Stephen Read Philosophie der Logik Hamburg 1997
Sal IV Wesley C. Salmon Logik Stuttgart 1983
Sai V R.M.Sainsbury Paradoxien Stuttgart 2001


Send Link

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-10-17