Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments | |||
| Deontology: theories within ethics that are related to the intrinsic nature of actions and do not consider their possible consequences. From this intrinsic nature obligations and prohibitions are derived. Counter position is consequentialism. See also ethics, intrinsic, actions, morals._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Item | Excerpt | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
Books on Amazon |
I 273 deontic logic / Geach: sentences with "can" are no imperatives - also no information ._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. |
Gea I P.T. Geach Logic Matters Oxford 1972 |
|
> Counter arguments against Geach
> Counter arguments in relation to Deontology
> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-17