Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 16f
Thinking / Prior: must not have the form of sentences - even if we think in sentence form, we do not think sets - e.g. we fear dogs, no sentences - fear that p does not lead to fear a sentence which means p - "I have my broken leg" does not mean:" I have broken what is usually called "my leg" in German" - my relation to the sentence is parasitic to the relation to the leg.
I 136
Thinking / general / Prior: one can certainly think of something general: E.g. that there are cases of infidelity.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Pri I
A. Prior
Objects of thought Oxford 1971

Pri II
Arthur N. Prior
Papers on Time and Tense 2nd Edition Oxford 2003

> Counter arguments against Prior

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-08-18