Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Definition: determination of the use of linguistic signs (words, symbols, connectives) for non-linguistic or linguistic objects. New definitions are not supposed to be creative, that is, they are to be derived from the use of the signs already employed. See also definability, conservativity, systems, theories, models, reference systems, context definition, explicit defnition, implicit definition.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 101
Functional definition/Schiffer: when the true-of-relation is a functional relation, it is "defined" in this way, and, indeed in tandem with the reference relation of names to objects. But this is no identity relative to a given functional relation and does not analyze the meaning.
I 159
Definition/Schiffer: does not go with open sentences.
I 213
Definition/Schiffer: is about equality of meaning - not meaning - also for the lexicon - has more to do with mention than with use - Understanding: more with use than with mention - Problem: E.g. meaning equality does not help in cas of e.g. "of" means ... e.g. "dog" means ... e.g. "she gave it to him" means....

Schi I
St. Schiffer
Remnants of Meaning Cambridge 1987

> Counter arguments against Schiffer
> Counter arguments in relation to Definitions

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-23