Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

That clause: partial sentence, expresses e.g. a belief (propositional attitude). This content is intensional, i.e. it is not objective. For some authors, the partial sentence "that it is raining" is the name of the sentence "It is raining".
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 7
That-clause/relational theory/Schiffer: is a singular term. - E.g. that snow is white has a reference that can be female/male - ((s) the incorrect sentence, ..) -Paratactic Analysis/Davidson: "that" (without ß) demonstrative, refers to my incident - SchifferVs: leads to the relation theory - (object of belief) - since there is an infinite number of relational predicates (> that-clause), they cannot appear as basic terms - Tradition:> compositionality.
I 9
That-clause/Schiffer: no singular term but indirect and partial characterization of what Elmar believes.
I 274
De Dicto/Schiffer: reduction to de dicto is only possible if a way of givenness without reference to objects of which they are about, is possible - ((s)> substitutional quantification?).
I 129
That-clause/belief/most authors/Schiffer: the that-clause does not refer to belief - that means to the neuronal Z-token which is the belief - but to entities with truth value and other content-determining characteristics - Problem: then we need (unlike propositions) an independent presentation of the contents of the neural Z-Tokens.
I 211
That-clause/Schiffer: Thesis: does not refer. Is no refering expression - problem: how should one explain: E.g. Paul and Elmar believe that ... so there is an attribute that they have in common - for nominalism, which denies any classes of properties, the language must not have compositional semantics.

Schi I
St. Schiffer
Remnants of Meaning Cambridge 1987

> Counter arguments against Schiffer

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-25