Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

 
Cartesianism: (goes back to René Descartes) the thesis that we must distinguish between extended entities (bodies, matter, res extensa) and unextended entities (spirit, soul). See also Dualism.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 107 ff
Cartesianism/Asymmetry/Avramidis: older tradition of deep epistemic asymmetry - mental objects only accessible through first-person perspective - other minds only guessable through behavior - then there is no superficial epistemic asymmetry - Important argument: ontological symmetry: mental and material on the same level - not obliged to physicalism - variant of Cartesianism: might even say the God standpoint could not recognize the intangible substance - deep epistemic asymmetry: if we could recognize the intangible substance, we could recognize foreign intentions without language. Cartesianism/Avramides: here: variant with divine access to the intangible


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Avr I
A. Avramides
Meaning and Mind Boston 1989


> Counter arguments against Avramides
> Counter arguments in relation to Cartesianism

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-21