Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Bridge laws: provide relations between the terms of two theories, if one of the theories is to be reduced to the other. See also reduction, reductionism, theories.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 135
Law/Natural Law/reductionism/connectives/interpretation/Fodor: Question: how the connective ">" is to be interpreted (in the reduction of a science to physics), is he transitive? - (generally accepted) - then there will have to be appropriate bridge laws - problem: the interpretation of the connective ">" in bridge laws themselves: is reductionism itself therefore a physical thesis - it cannot be equated with "caused", because that is asymmetric - if ">" any other relation than identity, then the truth of reductionism will only guarantee the truth of a weak version of physicalism - that it is nomologically necessary that the S and P predicates apply to the same objects - (this is the bridge law) - this is consistent with a non-physicalist ontology - e.g. that x-™ s fulfillment of S itself is not a physical event - some authors: bridge laws therefore express contingent event identity- (> token physicalism)

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

J. Fodor/E. Lepore
Holism Cambridge USA Oxford UK 1992

> Counter arguments against Fodor
> Counter arguments in relation to Bridge Laws

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  

Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-25