Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Bridge laws: provide relations between the terms of two theories, if one of the theories is to be reduced to the other. See also reduction, reductionism, theories.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 15
CartwrightVsBridge Laws: this is too simple a view of how explanations work; we must first provide a description of the situation before we can figure out the mathematical requirements of the theory.
I 132
Bridge Principles/BP/Cartwright: Tradition (Hempel, Gr├╝nbaum, Ernest Nagel): the propositions of a theory consist of two types: a) internal principles: content of the theory, laws about the behavior of the objects - b) bridge principles: connect the theory with more accessible aspects of reality (> "prepared description") - early: connection with monitoring reports - Vs: that does not work because of the theory ladenness of the observation new: connection of the the theory with already understood vocabulary - Hempel/late: (1979) this kind of explanation is not really deductive - HempelVsBridge-Principles: Problem: not invariably valid.
I 135
BP: saying which equations are to be chosen - (how we get into the mathematical language and out of it again).
I 205
CartwrightVsBridge Principles: instead of it we need insights on which operator is the right one for each problem. ((s) Operators/Cartwright/(s): represent the energies that are relevant in a situation within the equations.)

Car I
N. Cartwright
How the laws of physics lie Oxford New York 1983

> Counter arguments against Cartwright
> Counter arguments in relation to Bridge Laws

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-27