Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Observability: this is about the question of the limits of the observability of objects of science. See also theoretical terms, observation language, observation terms, observation sentence, existence, reality.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
I 17
Observability/Maxwell: Thesis: there is nothing basically unobservable, because I could have had electron eyes. (> possible world) - FraassenVsMaxwell: that's just a trick. - shifting the subject: if I were a giant, I would have ... - Physics describes ultimative observable limits - N.B.: these are literally human limitations. - Observable/Maxwell: classifies suspected items - has nothing to do with existence.
---
I 57
Limits of observability are empirical, not philosophical.
---
I 57
Observability/Theory/Fractures: what is observable can be found out by examining the theory itself. - ((s)> hermeneutic circle) - Nevertheless, the observability is not theory-relative - which is an observable (= physical quantity) is theory-independent - is a function of us as organisms.
---
I 75
Observability/Fraassen: e.g. Darwin's missing link: was an observable entity! - e.g. elementary particles: brought their own properties. Thus there is new information which was not contained in the old theory - namely, about the nature of these unobservable entities. Instead of accepting realism here, we can assume a purely functional view.
---
I 197
Observability/Fraassen: there is no logical link between observability and existence. A theory as far as empirical adequacy is concerned would be just as good if nothing existed that is either unobservable or non-actual.

Fr I
B. van Fraassen
The Scientific Image Oxford 1980


> Counter arguments against Fraassen



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-27