Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Conceptual content: If perceptions have conceptual content, that content brings linguistic features into play beyond the perceptual situation.

Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 408
Conceptual Content/Content/Frege/Brandom: Keyword: Substitution.
I 704
Conceptual/Propositional Content/Brandom: always inferentially structured - e.g. the defence lawyer believes a pathological liar is a credible witness.
I 703
In reality it is about whether the man is a liar, not whether the liar is a credible witness - two ways of talking about beliefs: - a) according to one you just believe what you believe to believe; according to the other - b ) anything to which one is tied by his beliefs for better or for worse.
II 212
Representation/Brandom: the conceptual content is not only inferentially , but also socially structured.
II 212f
Standards/Kant/Brandom: everything that is conceptually rich in content has normative significance.
I 215
We are responsible for our judgments.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Brandom

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-06-23