Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

 
Attributive/referential: difference in reference - attributive "whoever it is" (may not be identified) - referential the identified object.

_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

 
Books on Amazon
IV 101
Attributive/Tradition/Grammar: relative expressions such as "large", "hot" - Searle: require background: all big women are similar in terms of height - Attributive/Searle: what is meant and the sentence meaning are the same thing.
---
IV 161
Referential/Donnellan/Searle: S talked about e, no matter if e is actually F - you can then also report with other expressions than "the F" - Attributive: here there is no entity e, the speaker would not even have had in mind that they existed - attributive: the statement can then not be true.
---
VI 164
Donnellan: E.g. "the winner, whoever it is": here, in the attributive sense nothing is actually talked about - referential/attributive: there is no distinction between beliefs.
---
IV 165ff
Referential/Attributive/SearleVsDonnellan: instead: aspects: you can choose the aspect under which you speak about an object - primary A: if nothing satisfies it, the speaker had nothing in mind (hallucination) - secondary A: any aspect for which it is true that S tried to talk with it about the object, that fulfils its primary A, without being meant to belong to the truth conditions - Champagne example even works if water is in the glass - Searle: then the statement may also be true - the meaning does not change if no other aspect could assume the role of the primary one.
---
VI 175
Referential/Searle: brings secondary aspect - Attributive: brings primary A.
---
VI 176
Both readings can be intensional and extensional.
---
VI 175
What is meant is decisive - Difference sentence/finding: finding is decided, sentence is not (what was said literally).


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

S I
J. R. Searle
Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes Frankfurt 1996

S II
J.R. Searle
Intentionalität Frankfurt 1991

S III
J. R. Searle
Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit Hamburg 1997

S IV
J.R. Searle
Ausdruck und Bedeutung Frankfurt 1982

S V
J. R. Searle
Sprechakte Frankfurt 1983


> Counter arguments against Searle

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-24