|Attributive/referential: difference in reference - attributive "whoever it is" (may not be identified) - referential the identified object._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. |
Books on Amazon
|Wolf II 209
KripkeVsDonnellan: his theory is correct, but does not refute Russell's (better, because more consistent) theory - Distinction referential/attributive has nothing to do with distinction de re/de dicto (Donnellan ditto).
Wolf II 236f
Referential/attriutive/KripkeVsDonnellan: distinction speaker reference/semantic reference is needed anyway, it is sufficient instead of distinction referential/attributive - E.g. The real husband is irrelevant. - I do not need to have confused two people - I just believe that a person has a property that it lacks in reality.
Wolf II 222
E.g. "her husband is kind to her"/Linsky/Kripke: Problem with the statement: is it true? The use cannot be analyzed here, only the meanings of the sentence. - In referential use it is unclear what is meant by "statement"._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
Name und Notwendigkeit Frankfurt 1981
S. A. Kripke
Outline of a Theory of Truth (1975)
Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, R. L. Martin (Hg), Oxford/NY 1984
K II siehe Wol I
U. Wolf (Hg)
Eigennamen Frankfurt 1993