Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Omniscience: the ability to know all statements. - Logical problem even the understanding of a logically true statement could could cause the requirement, that all logical consequences are known. E.g. Knowing the calculation rules would logically require that all the results are known.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
Chisholm II M.David/L. Stubenberg (Hg) Philosophische Aufsätze zu Ehren von R.M. Chisholm Graz 1986

II 95ff
Omniscience / determinism / Gombocz: omniscience and freedom of action may be in conflict: the free-doer must be able to disappoint the forecast of the omniscient - formal paradox: the knowledge of the Omniscient shall contain at least the logical truth that the actions of the free-doer are free ((s) or that there is no freedom) -. omniscience does not rule out the possibility that others are omniscient, which leads to compensation losses in the other, if this free nature should be limited.
II 102
VsTheism / omniscience / Gombocz: endangered by will - variant: God limited his knowledge intentionally.

Chi I
R. Chisholm
Die erste Person Frankfurt 1992

Roderick M. Chisholm
Erkenntnistheorie Graz 2004

> Counter arguments against Chisholm
> Counter arguments in relation to Omniscience

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-29