Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data

Books on Amazon
I 128/9
Abstraction operator/Cresswell: basic law for him: ((lx) F (x)) (t) ↔ F (t) - to be an x such that F (x) is true iff t. F (t) - t: any Term - This applies to neo-Russellian language, but fails if F is an intensional predicate, because then we would have O ((lx) Ofx) (s) ↔ OOfs. and the distinction would collapse. Solution/Stalnaker: Do not use descriptions as names. - But treat them as close as possible. CresswellVsStalnaker: this will not always work because not all are real names.

Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.

Cr I
M. J. Cresswell
Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988

M. J. Cresswell
Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984

> Counter arguments against Cresswell

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-07-26