Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments | |||
|
| |||
| Dependence: Question whether statements, phenomena, beliefs, attitudes, actions are influenced causally or otherwise by other statements, beliefs, events, actions etc. and whether this influence is indispensable for their realization. See also counterfactuals, absoluteness._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Item | Excerpt | Meta data |
|---|---|---|---|
Books on Amazon |
I 144 experience-dependent / Peacocke: if properties can be causally explained and the object of experience is in a contingent relationship - even places and times (even if they are not experienced literally) - independent of experience: recognition, demonstratives, [self], [now]_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. |
Pea I Chr. R. Peacocke Sense and Content Oxford 1983 |
|
> Counter arguments against Peacocke
> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-09-22