Dictionary of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Author Item Summary Meta data
Corr I 48
Interactionism/Mischel/Asendorpf: If each person’s score depends upon only a few observations for each situation, a large portion of the situation by person interaction will very likely be due to measurement error. Only if the situational differences within persons are reliable (as in the study by Shoda, Mischel and Wright 1994)(1) does it make sense to interpret the person by situation interaction at all. >Interactionism/Asendorpf, >Consistency/Mischel, >Situations/Psychological Theories.

1. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W. and Wright, J. C. 1994. Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behaviour: incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 674–87

Jens B. Asendorpf, “Personality: Traits and situations”, in: Corr, Ph. J. & Matthews, G. (eds.) 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Mischel, Walter
Corr I
Philip J. Corr
Gerald Matthews
The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology New York 2009


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Mischel
> Counter arguments in relation to Interactionism

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2019-03-19
Legal Notice   Contact   Data protection declaration