|Brocker I 814
Governance/Slavehood/Kojève/Drury: Unlike Hegel, Kojève shifts the relationship between Governance and Slavehood to the world-historical last instances Stalin and the communist world state. He sees the latter better able to satisfy the basic social needs of all people than the Prussian state envisaged by Hegel. (KojèveVsHegel). Later, Kojève transferred this goal to the American Way of Life. (1)
KojèveVsHegel: in Kojève, unlike at Hegel, in the end the slave and thus the masses, win over the master. But since the slave embodies the weak, the cowardly, the small and the animalistic, the victory of the slave over the master ends in a rule of mediocrity or in the driving of a reanimalized humanity into undesirably happy consumption. ((s) According to Drury, Kojève does not carry out Hegel's dialectical movement, according to which master and slave converge.) See also History/Fukuyama.
DruryVsKojève: this is a "fascist interpretation" of the struggle for recognition. (2)
1. Shadia B. Drury, „The End of History and the New World Order“, in: International Journal 48/1, 1992/93, p. 80-99.
2. Ibid. p. 80
Anja Jetschke, „Francis Fukuyama, Das Ende der Geschichte“, in: Manfred Brocker (Hg.) Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M. 2018_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert Frankfurt/M. 2018