|Brocker I 304
Alienation/Beauvoir: Background: the relationship between men and women: there is no struggle for recognition. The woman remains "the unessential that never becomes the essential, [...] the absolute other without reciprocity" (1). See Gender Roles/Beauvoir.
The price the woman has to pay for the man's dream is her objectification, her renunciation of transcendence and thus her imprisonment in immanence. It describes her fate to exist as the and the "other" of the male subject. See Immanence/Beauvoir, Transcendence/Existentialism.
Governance/Question: why is this gender relationship so permanent?
Solution/Beauvoir: Each governance is the more stable, the more the ruled can find their advantage in it. It is a relationship of domination for mutual benefit, which nevertheless distorts both sides.
Beauvoir: "The woman pursues a dream of self-abandonment and the man a dream of alienation"(2). There is a "secret agreement.“(3).
1. Simone de Beauvoir, Le deuxième sexe, Paris 1949. Dt.: Simone de Beauvoir, Das andere Geschlecht. Sitte und Sexus der Frau, Reinbek 2005 (zuerst 1951), S. 192.
2. Ibid p. 885.
Friederike Kuster, „Simone de Beauvoir, Das andere Geschlecht (1949)“ in: Manfred Brocker (Hg.) Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M. 2018_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
|Beauvoir, Simone de
Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert Frankfurt/M. 2018