Sigmund Freud on Internalisation - Dictionary of Arguments
Habermas IV 20/21
Internalisation/Freud/Habermas: similar to G. H. Mead, Freud and Piaget introduce a learning mechanism of internalisation, Piaget in the sense of an "interiorization" of action schemes, Freud in the sense of the internalisation of relationships with a social object, namely a (abandoned) reference person.
Unlike in the case of a reflexive relationship, in which a subject bends back to itself to make itself an object of itself, the model of internalisation states that the subject finds itself in an exterior by taking in and appropriating what opposes it as an object.
The structure of appropriation differs from that of reflection by the opposite sense of direction: the self does not refer to itself by making itself an object, but that it recognizes the relinquished subjective in the external object, the action schema or the relationship schema.
HabermasVs: these explanations remain attached to the model of the philosophy of consciousness. This model, which is based on an inner dialogue, can already be found in Augustine's work. (1)
1.Vgl. G. H. Mead, Mind, Self and Society (Ed) Ch. W. Morris (German) Frankfurt 1969); L. S. Vygotski, Denken und Sprechen, Frankfurt, 1961._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse Hamburg 2011
Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne Frankfurt 1988
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. I Frankfurt/M. 1981
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Bd. II Frankfurt/M. 1981