Dictionary of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Author Item Summary Meta data
Morozov I 217
Markets/Technology/Kelly/Morozov: Kelly thesis: the limitation of technology is ineffective, if not harmful. Restrictions are also not permanent. If something is confined in one place, it comes back to life elsewhere. (1)
Globalization/Marketplace/Kelly: Thesis: Where a technology is banned locally, it slips out of control to be bundled elsewhere on the globe. (2)
MorozovVsKelly: but why should we take a global view of technology when it is regulated by local conditions? Maybe a local community was strong enough to block something unacceptable.
Politics/MorozovVsKelly: the misleading thing about his speech is that it is technological, but in reality it is highly political.


1. Kevin Kelly, What Technology Wants, Kindle ed. (New York: Penguin Books, 2011), p. 242
2. ibid. p. 243


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.

Kelly I
Kevin Kelly
What Technology Wants New York 2011

Morozov I
Evgeny Morozov
To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism New York 2014


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Kelly

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  



Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2019-03-22
Legal Notice   Contact   Data protection declaration