|Brocker I 891
Freedom/NussbaumVsSen/Nussbaum: More than Amartya Sen, Nussbaum is concerned with defining a core of certain "capabilities" as an indispensable basic asset. In other words: to "substantial" behaves "procedural" as a counter-concept. (1)
SenVsVs/SenVsNussbaum/Dierksmeier: But it was precisely the highlight of Sen's "substantive freedom" that the procedural and participatory moment was by no means pushed to the periphery, but rather moved to the centre. See >Freedom/Sen, >Capabilities/Sen.
1. Martha C. Nussbaum, Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, Princeton 2010, S. 18
Claus Dierksmeier, „Amartya Sen, Ökonomie für den Menschen (1999)“ in: Manfred Brocker (Hg.) Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M. 2018_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert Frankfurt/M. 2018