Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Reflection: Reflection is the process of thinking critically about one's own beliefs, values, and experiences. See also Experience, Thinking, Values, Beliefs._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
William James on Reflection - Dictionary of Arguments
Horwich I 36 Reflection/Thinking/James: At every moment it applies that, what we think our object is, is not the way we think about it (know it) at the moment.(1) >Thinking/James. 1. William James (1907) "Pragmatisms Conception of Truth“ (Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 4 p. 141-55 and 396-406) in: Paul Horwich (Ed.) Theories of Truth, Aldershot 1994_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Horwich I P. Horwich (Ed.) Theories of Truth Aldershot 1994 |
||
> Counter arguments against James
> Counter arguments in relation to Reflection
