Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Epistemology, philosophy: examines the conditions for the emergence of knowledge and the basis for justification and confirmation. Epistemology cannot explain special cases in which someone who has less information may give more correct answers. See also knowledge, theory, justification, confirmation, reliability._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Th.W. Adorno on Epistemology - Dictionary of Arguments
Grenz 123 Epistemology/Adorno/Grenz: the epistemology pushes from itself to dialectics: the concept of the non-conceptual cannot linger in itself, the epistemology. Namely the epistemology is forced to the reality of philosophy (Negative Dialektik(1), p. 139). >Dialectic, >Dialectic/Adorno. 1. Th. W. Adorno. Negative Dialektik. In: Gesammelte Schriften, Band 6: Negative Dialektik. Jargon der Eigentlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1970. p. 139 --- XIII 89 Epistemology/Adorno: in the epistemology in the concise sense, the relationship between the object and the subject itself becomes thematic. Subject/Object-Problem. XIII 90 With this, it is reflected on how thinking of the subject works on a thought object, how knowledge with validity or truth can tell something about a thought. >Subject, >Object, >Thinking, >Intersubjectivity, >Objectivity, >World/Thinking. Hegel/Adorno: in him, the epistemology is called logic. Logic becomes a metaphysics overall in idealism.(1) >G.W.F. Hegel, >Logic/Hegel. Epistemology/Idealism/Adorno: thus claims to be the doctrine of the Absolute. This is, in essence, already so in Kant's case, at least negative, since reason itself is exercising criticizing itself. >Idealism, >Immanuel Kant. XIII 178 Epistemology/Adorno: it cannot reach the moments which are those of pleasure and displeasure. This is a sign that it does not actually correspond to what it claims, namely, the full reproduction of the content of consciousness, the phenomenology of the mind (spoken with Hegel). >Positivism/Adorno, >Consciousness. 1. G.W.F. Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik, I, S. 46._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
A I Th. W. Adorno Max Horkheimer Dialektik der Aufklärung Frankfurt 1978 A II Theodor W. Adorno Negative Dialektik Frankfurt/M. 2000 A III Theodor W. Adorno Ästhetische Theorie Frankfurt/M. 1973 A IV Theodor W. Adorno Minima Moralia Frankfurt/M. 2003 A V Theodor W. Adorno Philosophie der neuen Musik Frankfurt/M. 1995 A VI Theodor W. Adorno Gesammelte Schriften, Band 5: Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie. Drei Studien zu Hegel Frankfurt/M. 1071 A VII Theodor W. Adorno Noten zur Literatur (I - IV) Frankfurt/M. 2002 A VIII Theodor W. Adorno Gesammelte Schriften in 20 Bänden: Band 2: Kierkegaard. Konstruktion des Ästhetischen Frankfurt/M. 2003 A IX Theodor W. Adorno Gesammelte Schriften in 20 Bänden: Band 8: Soziologische Schriften I Frankfurt/M. 2003 A XI Theodor W. Adorno Über Walter Benjamin Frankfurt/M. 1990 A XII Theodor W. Adorno Philosophische Terminologie Bd. 1 Frankfurt/M. 1973 A XIII Theodor W. Adorno Philosophische Terminologie Bd. 2 Frankfurt/M. 1974 |
||
> Counter arguments against Adorno
> Counter arguments in relation to Epistemology
