Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Terminology: This section explains special features of the language used by the individual authors. _____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Michael Esfeld on Terminology - Dictionary of Arguments
I 174 ~ Answer Dependence/Esfeld: variants: something is exactly then an x if a) there are normal circumstances and normal observers, b) regular members, c) it does not reduce to appearance, d) the acquisition is done by disposition, e) there are secondary qualities, i.e. not only acquisition but also content and f) it does not require a special property of the members. Because of the answer dependence there is no view from nowhere in the world._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Es I M. Esfeld Holismus Frankfurt/M 2002 |
||
> Counter arguments against Esfeld
> Counter arguments in relation to Terminology
