Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Charles B. Martin on Object - Dictionary of Arguments
Martin III 178ff Object/Martin: Objects are simple - even spread objects are possible, but not completely constituted by present awareness of place and time (spatial property is not sufficient). Universals/Armstrong: Universals are simply fully constituted in each instantiation. MartinVs: that is mysterious. Martin III 180 Complex object/MartinVsArmstrong: complex objects can be distributed: "what-it-is-and-what-it-is-not". - That is possible, but unlike a universal. - In all these distributed objects there is a difference between more or less "ctually contained things" and that is not allowed for Armstrong._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Martin I C. B. Martin Properties and Dispositions In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Martin II C. B. Martin Replies to Armstrong and Place In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Martin III C. B. Martin Final Replies to Place and Armstrong In Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996 Martin IV C. B. Martin The Mind in Nature Oxford 2010 |
||
> Counter arguments against Martin
> Counter arguments in relation to Object ...
