Psychology Dictionary of Arguments

Home Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Propositions, philosophy: propositions are defined as the meanings of sentences, whereby a sentence is interpreted as a character string, which must still be interpreted in relation to a situation or a speaker. E.g. “I am hungry” has a different meaning from the mouth of each new speaker. On the other hand, the sentence “I am hungry” from the mouth of the speaker, who first expressed the German sentence, has the same meaning as the German sentence uttered by him. See also meaning, propositional attitudes, identity conditions, opacity, utterances, sentences.
_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Concept Summary/Quotes Sources

Stephen Schiffer on Propositions - Dictionary of Arguments

Graeser I 129
SchifferVsPropositions: propositions are no language-independent contents of corresponding settings: they could not even perform this function.
>Content
.
SchifferVsRepresentation: the contents of sentences in question cannot be representations, for example, in a language of thought.
>Representation, >Language of thought.
Belief/Schiffer: Vs belief as a relation.
>Relation theory.
Meaning/SchifferVsDavidson: if there can neither be a sentence-oriented nor a non-sentence-oriented analysis of meaning, then also the possibility of conception of judgmental settings as relations collapses.
Graeser: thus we lose the ground under our feet.
---
Schiffer I XVIIff
SchifferVsPropositions/late: propositions should contain E.g. dog property.
Intention-based semantics/Grice: requires, however, that propositions are neural sentences.
Problem: there are no truth conditions in mentalese.
>Mentalese, >Truth conditions.
I 14
Propositions: have their truth values ​​essentially.
Phrases/expressionsSchiffer: have their truth values ​​contingently. - (in public speech or in mentalese)
Proposition: content itself, is not representation but is represented.
I 49f
Propositions/Belief object/relation theory/SchifferVsPropositions: a proposition always requires natural kind terms.
Even substitution is not compatible with any propositional theory.
Propositional theory: says
1) that "p" is a real object variable
2) that propositions are their values.
Proposition: abstract, not in space and time - yet real concrete components.
E.g. Capitol in "The Capitol is in NY".
But only if fine-grained (as a complex of individuals and properties). - They are objective and mind-independent as opposed to pain and mental representations.
>Pain, >Mental representation.
"Thought"/Frege: = Proposition; also the components and characteristics of propositions are abstract and language independent: e.g. the whiteness of snow.
Problem: VsPropositions: they carry an ontological commitment to Platonism.
>Platonism.
I 51
SchifferVsPropositions: propositions are superfluous such as facts and features. - E.g. Michele has the property to be funny (or the fact that funny ...). - This is a doubling.
Complexes that include individuals as a structure as components and properties.
Situation Semantics/Barwise/Perry, Lewis 1970a - (grainy: set of)
Problem: from compositionality for reference follows that the proposition "snow is white" is necessarily true if snow is white.
Different: as sets of possible worlds propositions include their speakers not as components.
>Fine-grained/coarse-grained.
I 52
Proposition: different: if = functions of possible worlds on truth values, then speakers do not function as components. - Then maybe partial functions that maps a possible world onto the truth, iff snow is white.
Problem: unstructured propositions (functions) cause necessary equivalent propositions to be identical. - Then the problem of logical omniscience follows.
>Omniscience.
Solution: structured (fine-grained) entities: contain objects, properties, operators, which they determine.

_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments
The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.

Schi I
St. Schiffer
Remnants of Meaning Cambridge 1987

Grae I
A. Graeser
Positionen der Gegenwartsphilosophie. München 2002


Send Link

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Y   Z