Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Analogy: an analogy is a formal parallelism. It intends to show that from a similar case, similar conclusions can be drawn._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Uwe Meixner on Analogies - Dictionary of Arguments
I 25f Ontological Analogy/Meixner: the different contents that the transcendentals take in the different categories stand in a systematic context: ontological analogy. E.g. individuals are possible in a different way than facts are. Likewise, individuals are differently "actual" than facts. I.e. the different transcendentals do not have the same conceptual content in the different categories. >Transcendentals, >Categories, >Ontology, >Content, >Conceptual content, >Empirical content, >Individuals, >States of affairs._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Mei I U. Meixner Einführung in die Ontologie Darmstadt 2004 |
||
