Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome | |||
| |||
Dialectic: Dialectics in philosophy is a method of reasoning that involves examining opposing ideas and how they interact with each other. It is based on the idea that things are constantly changing and developing, and that this change is driven by contradiction._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Carl Schmitt on Dialectic - Dictionary of Arguments
Brocker I 172 Dialectic/Schmitt: in his Parliamentarism paper (1), Schmitt argues "intellectual-historically". His form of intellectual history resembles more the type of Hegelianism than Wilhelm Dilthey's historiography of the humanities, accentuated in cultural and literary studies, which around 1900 stood out from the strong "dialectical" construction of a self-logical "absolute spirit" of the Hegelians. However, Schmitt does not construct his intellectual history as a Hegelian. He knows no dialectic of his own logic, no dialectical determinism. However, his sketch also seems to characterize what Schmitt writes about Marx's relationship to "Hegel's Dialectic of History". His brochure also shows: "The dialectical construction of rising consciousness forces the constructing thinker to think of himself with his thinking as the peak of development" (2). >Dialectic/Hegel, >Philosophy of History/Hegel. 1. Carl Schmitt, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus, in: Bonner Festgabe für Ernst Zitelmann zum fünfzigjährigen Doktorjubiläum, München/Leipzig 1923, 413-473. Separatveröffentlichung in der Reihe: Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen und Reden zur Philosophie, Politik und Geistesgeschichte, Bd. 1, München/Leipzig 1923. Zweite, erweiterte Auflage 1926 2. Ibid. p. 73. Reinhard Mehring, Carl Schmitt, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus (1923), in: Manfred Brocker (Hg.) Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M. 2018._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Schmitt I Carl Schmitt Der Hüter der Verfassung Tübingen 1931 Brocker I Manfred Brocker Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert Frankfurt/M. 2018 |