Economics Dictionary of Arguments

Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Author Item Summary Meta data
Brocker I 331
National Socialism/Camus: Camus treats National Socialism only marginally. Not only does it seem to be unsuitable for the revolt. Nor does it offer any interesting arguments. The more banal evil presents itself - as Hannah Arendt characterized it - the more boundless it becomes. Thus Camus gives the verdict: "Hitler represents the perhaps unique case in history of a tyrant who leaves nothing behind in his favour" (1).


1. Albert Camus, L’Homme révolté, Paris 1951. Dt.: Albert Camus, Der Mensch in der Revolte. Essays, Reinbek 1969 (zuerst 1953), S. 151.

Hans-Martin Schönherr-Mann, „Albert Camus, Der Mensch in der Revolte (1951)“ in: Manfred Brocker (Hg.) Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M. 2018.


_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution.
The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
Camus, Albert
Brocker I
Manfred Brocker
Geschichte des politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert Frankfurt/M. 2018


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Camus
> Counter arguments in relation to National Socialism

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z