Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Berka I 268
Negation/Dialogical Logic/Lorenzen: If i a is asserted by P, it has lost when O asserts the assertion a and successfully defends it.
N.B.: precisely in this way the intuitionist logic arises.
Intuitionist Logic/Lorenzen: there is no winning strategy for A v i A: E.g.

O P

A v i A
? A I i A
? I A

I 269
Here, for the variable A, we put a statement such that O knows a proof of it, but P does not.
Winning strategy/negation/dialogical logic/Lorenzen: for the explanation I show additionally that there is a winning strategy for:
i i (A v i A)

O P
i i (A v i A)

i (A v i A) A v i A
? i A
A A v i A
? A (1)


1. P. Lorenzen, Ein dialogisches Konstruktivitätskriterium, in: Infinitistic Methods, (1961), 193-200

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.