Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 145
Operator/Bigelow/Pargetter: an operator is something that does not occur in the normal language (everyday language).
>Everyday language.
In contrast, it occurs in equations.
>Equations.
For example, the plus sign:
Plus/Plus sign/+/Bigelow/Pargetter: if it stands between two number names (!), (e.g."3" and "5", it makes a new term out of it, namely "(3 + 5)" which in turn refers to a number.
>Names, >Reference, >Numbers.
That is, plus makes a new name from two old names.
Everyday language: it is not absolutly necessary to add operators to it. You can also have their tasks done by predicates. For example, instead of + we can accept a predicate R.
>Predicates.
I 146
Operator/Predicate/Bigelow/Pargetter: in general: for an n-digit operator, there will be a (n+1)-digit predicate:

O (x1,... xn) = x (n+1),

instead we can say:

Ro(x1,…xn, x(n+1)).

I 145
Operator/Bigelow/Pargetter: For example, plus, plus sign,"+": is applied to number names and provides new number names.
Operator: corresponds semantically to a relation.
>Relations.
Relation/Bigelow/Pargetter: is used differently in semantics: instead of using a relation to determine the semantic value of a sentence, we use it to obtain the referent of a compound referential term.
>Semantics, >Semantic value.
Relation/syntactic rule:

Ro(x1,… x(n+1)).

Is true iff (x1,... x (n+1) stand in the required relation.
On the other hand,
Operator/syntactic rule:

O (x1,... xn)

refers to x(n+1) iff x1,…x(n+1) stand in the required relation
I 146
Operator: an n-digit operator could be replaced by a predicate for a relation for a (n+1)-digit relation - but there are different syntactic rules: statement about relation true/false.
>Truth values.
Statement with operator: refers to - With probability: e.g. P (p v q) = P(p) + P(q) - P(p u q) is the compound expression and not a name, but a sentence.
>Sentences.
This converts it into a referring statement (this in turn is a name).
+Plus sign: two-names-one-name-operator - P: sentence-to-name-operator.
Operator/Probability/Bigelow/Pargetter: here "P" is an operator that can be applied to composite terms (possibly with "+").
This compound term (example P(p v q) = P(p) + P(q) - P (p u q)
is not a name,...
I 147
...but a sentence.
Operator/probability: thus P converts a sentence into a referring expression. (This is again a name.)
Probability/Possibility/Necessity/Modality/Bigelow/Pargetter: "necessary" and would be > would be can be reinterpreted as probability operators.
>Probability, >Possibility, >Necessity, >Modalities.
For example, "it is likely to grade n that...".
Such operators make sentences out of sentences.
For example, operator P: for each sentence p

P(p)

will refer to the number n, iff

it is likely to grade n that p

is true.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.