Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 76
Conditioning: conditioning cannot be learned for its part.
XI 102
Psychology/knowledge/Quine/Lauener: why should we not trace back everything to psychology.
QuineVs: science should not be justified by a discipline that belongs to itself.
XII 91
Epistemology/Psychology/Quine: if sensory stimulation is the only thing, why not just turn to psychology?
TraditionVsPsychology/Quine: that used to seem circular.
No Circle/QuineVsVs: Solution: we simply have to refrain from deducting science from observations. If we only want to understand the connection between observation and science, we need all the information we can get. Also those from science, which studies exactly this connection.
>Psychology/Quine, >Science/Quine.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.