Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 410
Def Environment/J. von Uexküll/Radner: the factors that affect the animal. Their number and solidarity is determined by the animal's construction plan.
Def Inner world/J. v. Uexküll/Radner: consists of the effects produced by the environmental factors in the nervous system. These effects are also ensured and regulated by the construction plan.
>Inner world.
I 411
For example, the hetero-phenomenological problem of color blindness is essentially an environmental problem.
>Heterophänomenology.
I 411
Environment/Inner world/Radner: both can be approached from the viewpoint of the 1st and the 3rd person.
>First Person.
I 412
This distinction does not correspond to that between car and hetero-phenomenology.
Hetero-phenomenology: 1st, 3rd Person/environment/inner world: all combination of questions are possible.
Environment/hetero-phenomenological: 3rd person: E.g.: "How do things appear to the subject?"
1st Person: E.g. "How would things appear to me if I had a sense device like that of the subject?"
>Appearance, >Perception.
Inner world/hetero-phenomenological: 3rd person: E.g.: "How are the experiences of the subject?"
>Experiences.
1st Person: E.g. "How would my experiences be if I were in the circumstances of the subject and had certain characteristics in common with it?".
I 418
Environment/Animal/Radner: the (Uexkull's) environment of an animal can be explored independently of any consideration of its inner world.
>Environment/Uexküll, >Environment, >Animals.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.