Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Holz I 49/50
World/"Chain"/Theory/Explanation/Leibniz: a theory of the world must (...) be formulated as a chain of sentences, which can be reduced by the last term ascending to identical sentences (A = B).
>World/Leibniz, >Order/Leibniz, >Justification/Leibniz.
I 50
Predicate/"chain of proofs"/proof/Leibniz: therefore the predicate or the following is always inhabiting the subject or the preceding.
>Proof/Leibniz.
The very first term needs not to be proved, for to prove is nothing but to trace back a proposition to a simple identical one. It can therefore not be proved at all.
108/109
Predicates/Substances/Leibniz: Logical, ontological double sense:
A) the real correspondence of the predicates, which can be expressed by a substance
B) the properties which substances must have in order that they are beings.
>Substance/Leibniz.
Holz: Leibniz has to trace this back to the self-sufficiency of the substances.
Everything that happens to the soul and every substance is a consequence of its concept. The perceptions arise spontaneously from their own nature. > Spontaneity.
The soul expresses in a certain manner, for a definite time, the state of the universe according to the relations of the other bodies to it. ("Windowlessness" of the monads).
>Concept/Leibniz.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.