Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute

Complaints - Corrections

Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II


What is wrong?
Other metadata
Excerpt or content

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

Meggle I 300
Presupposition/Strawson: Definition "S presupposes S'": The truth of S' is a necessary condition of the truth or falsity of the assertion that S.
E.g. "All my children sleep tight" presupposes "I have children".
I 303
HungerlandVsStrawson: the relationship that it defines is not that of context implication. I also imply that I believe to have children.
His definition does not refer to the beliefs or intentions of speakers or listeners, nor to any circumstances of communication.
I 304
HungerlandVsStrawson: the presupposition seems to contain a hidden rule. What is it? It is rather a formal logical than one of the normal language.
I 309
Strawson/Presupposition: "The S is P".

Hungerland: consists of two independent parts: 1. Function of the specific article, (relevant grammar). Strawson's model is a logical explanation model.
HungerlandVsStrawson: normal communication does not proceed in this way.
I 310
HungerlandVsStrawson: he has mixed up rules and exception (in regard to frequency).
Meggle I 318
StrawsonHungerland: Strawson also takes mistakes as exceptions from the rule (HungerlandVs).
I 320
E.g. Survey service: "Have you switched on your TV right now?" (If one has no device) The answer is "No", correct?
Hungerland: all respondents answered "Right!" Exception: a philosopher.
I 321
Rules/Hungerland: rules are only useful if they are formulated according to actions that can be considered as a standard.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.