Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Berka I 340
Loewenheim/Hilbert/Ackermann: Loewenheim has shown that every expression that is universal for the countable domain has the same property for every other domain. In Loewenheim, however, the sentence appears in the dual version:
Every formula of the function calculus is either contradictory or can be satisfied within a countable infinite range of thought.
>Satisfaction, >Satisfiability, >Models, >Model theory, >Functional calculus, >Countability.
General Validity/Hilbert/Ackermann: examples of formulas which are valid in each domain are all formulas that can be proved from axioms of a system.
>Validity, >Universal validity.
Loewenheim/Hilbert/Ackermann: Loewenheim has made another remarkable proposition: in the treatment of the logical formulas one can restrict oneself to those in which only function symbols with a maximum of two vacancies occur(1). This corresponds to:
Schroeder: the general relative calculus can be traced back to the binary calculus(2).
>Logical formulas.

1. L. Löwenheim: Über Möglichkeiten im Relativkalkül, Math. Annalen 76 (1915), pp. 447-470, p. 459.
2. D. Hilbert & W. Ackermann: Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik, Berlin, 6. Aufl. Berlin/Göttingen/Heidelberg 1972, § 12.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.